It’s a fast system that seems like it is the geekier of the two options. They are both winners but I still have a preference for one. If you already have a favorite, then stick with it. Perhaps the CloudApp policy is more realistic. I like how the Droplr policy reads a bit better than the CloudApp policy. They both have reasonable privacy policies. Both apps also display a history of uploaded files in the menubar drop down with a running count of the number of clicks on each link.īoth apps provide a quick action to launch the web app which is the only way to organize, edit and delete uploads from the Mac. When complete, the application displays a Growl alert and places the link on the clipboard.
Files can be directly dropped on the menu bar icon. On the Mac, both apps are nearly equivalent. These are top notch services and their apps are well designed and engineered.
DROPLR SHORTCUTS WINDOWS
Both CloudApp and Droplr provide excellent web access, which is important for me since I work on Windows most of the day. There are native Mac, iOS, Web applications. Common Groundīoth services provide convenient tools for uploading a file and grabbing a link to share. That means Mac, iOS and Web access matter and that’s how I’ve structured this comparison. 1 I want a system that will allow me to capture from anywhere and get back a link. But I’ve been looking for a more convenient and ubiquitous sharing solution so I have been test driving Droplr and CloudApp. I use the FTP host for posting to Macdrifter and I use the S3 links for sharing with friends.
I use this system every day and it works like a charm. I have my own FTP upload and Amazon S3 push, both built on Hazel. I’ve built many custom solutions for uploading and sharing files.
0 kommentar(er)
